Aug 302009
 

I remember a time when everyone made lists like: “10 things you did’t know about me”. Today, that’s Twitter. Or at least for some it is.
Someone much meaner and more cynical then I may call today “the Age of Stalking”. This (fake) iPhone commercial makes fun of exactly that. It is incredibly easy to find someone, get a hold of someone, or — along the lines of Twitter — know what people are doing at this exact moments. Fresh along with GPS data from their iPhones, of course.

The weekly news reports about companies who google the people who interview for a job, to the kids who share private pics of one another online. I know people who don’t care. I also know people who say they have nothing to hide. But I also know people who are scared of sharing anything online because they are afraid it might come back and bite them. To a certain extent, everyone is right. Or wrong — whatever side you may come from.
Taking the job hunt example — the gist of the reports were basically that if you have unflattering pics or facts about you online, that may hurt your job search. If you can’t be found at all — same result. This is exactly the advice you wanted. Right?

Nowadays there are people who know what they are talking about. Especially when it comes to Social Media and the good, bad and ugly within. They live Social Media, breathe it, get paid for it and are worth every single dime. You can find those people online, follow them on Twitter, read their blogs and even books. The more you USE Social Media, the more you will be able to tell the “experts” apart from those who don’t even call themselves experts cause they simply ARE. Between people out there looking for a quick fix, a quick dollar and a quick 500.000 followers on Twitter, not everyone has the time and patience to find those who know what they are doing.
The point I want to make is that 90% do NOT know what they are talking about. Would you believe an online reporter who advises people on Social Media who hasn’t updated his blog in a year and has only a profile on MySpace. Those of you who are nodding now, safe to say, you know a thing or two about Social Media.

I went a bit off topic here, but I wanted to make a point. There are lots of people out there who will freely tell you what to do and what not to do in Social Media. The biggest worry and the main focus here is (besides “money making”) data privacy. If you are not a SPAM bot, if you are a private person or company, you would not want Social Media to backfire on you. And it happens. A lot.
Imagine someone you have a high opinion of — and this person is on Twitter. If this person is on Twitter in the same “role” than you are, you can take them as model. Of course, everyone’s threshold is different as well as cultural, professional or random differences.
Who do you want to be? And who DON’T you want to be?

This is the central question when it comes to your data. I don’t want to tell you what is ok and what isn’t. Also because I don’t even know. I just wanted to show how someone may make an informed decision about what they want to share and what they’d rather keep to themselves. A drunk party picture might be ok and might not, a picture in a costume might depend on said costume. Do you want your boss to know what you did on the weekend? Or don’t you care?

Don’t despair tho, there IS someone who can tell you what is wrong and right for you. No kidding. There is a person, even for you, who can make the call. Which picture is appropriate, which information is too much. You want to know who?

YOU.

Look inside yourself, inquire what you want and how you want to be seen. And then — go crazy!

 August 30, 2009  Posted by on August 30, 2009 Law, Social Media Tagged with: ,  No Responses »
Aug 222009
 

This is the setting of my dream TV network(s). I hope, one day this (or something along those lines), will be reality. For now I can only dream.
The TV network of my dreams produces its own shows — like most do. They have a video portal where people are able to watch their TV shows. They are offered in different qualities — regular, HD, iPod, … and both as a stream or downloadable. All their shows can be seen while they air as well as afterwards. The only difference is — the service isn’t limited to their own country.

In order not to ruin anyone in the food chain, this service of getting TV shows isn’t free. BUT everyone, from all over the world can get it. There are different rates depending on if you want HD, download it, one TV show or all of them, or without advertisements. Since people have to sign up, the advertisers can customize their ads depending on where the viewers are coming from.

So far, the networks would make more money from all the international viewers who would rather have the possibility to get new TV shows legally and pay for it, than to get it off the internet. There have been voices that there should be more “flat-rate” options for copyrighted material. As unpractical this might be for many as far as music is concerned (one usually listens to a song more often than watches an episode of a TV show), for TV shows this could be a real alternative.

Another member of the TV food chain would be the international TV stations that pay tons of money to be the “first ones” to air the hottest TV shows. That this still means a one-year delay, no one seems to consider. Besides the fact that I have a hard time thinking it takes a year to translate one episode of a TV show, there is still the market that doesn’t speak the TV show’s original language. So maybe, national TV channels would pay less for the new TV shows, giving them at the same time the possibility to buy more. And the producing channel would get in the revenue of those people anyway in a more direct way.

I don’t see any copyright licensing problems here, since I am sure the network that produced the show has all the rights.

Call me out if I forgot someone in the food chain, that I would ruin someone with my idea — which isn’t my intention at all.
I know that there are more and more services that offer, for example, TV shows for download. But those aren’t always available on a global level. And I also admit that we are (hopefully) on the right way, and that we might only need patience.
Again, since I don’t have any patience, I want it now.
Well, yesterday.
Or at least before the summer hiatus is over.

Prettyplease??

 August 22, 2009  Posted by on August 22, 2009 TV Tagged with:  No Responses »
Aug 142009
 

Well, it’s certainly not the first.

Especially the EU took the challenge and produced a lot of legislation for almost all matters IT. From the Distant Selling Directive, to the E-Commerce Directive up to directives on data privacy, IP law, competition law, cyber crime and many, many more.

I decided to specialize on this field quite early in law school – also because it’s my hobby.

With another EU directive for consumer protection (especially online) coming up, it was time for me to write a little bit about the problems that still exists when it comes to IT law – and probably they always will.

From a work standpoint, where I try to solve legal problems from consumers and companies alike, to my personal live as a new media geek, podcaster, social media nut and what else you might call me, the legal problems I come across are as divers as the people who encounter them.
The background of this blog post is, that I would like to do a legal podcast. Either for work or “just” my own pleasure, I don‘t know yet. Anyway, it made me think of all those crazy stories, and legally challenging questions that I have encountered.
As I mentioned before, the EU is getting out more and more laws in the fields that interest me. That doesn’t make them easy to apply, but at least there is something out there.
The same might be said about the US – another legal system and market I came in close contact with. Not knowing enough about US IT law, it’s safe to assume that within the US there are rules concerning the big IT law fields – E-Commerce, Intellectual Property, Data Privacy and Cyber Crime.

Now I’m going even further in saying that providers of any kind of online “goods or services” (which is a EU term I’m not too fond of) – whether charging people for it or not – do not want to or are not able to limit their potential base of recipients. Because they WANT to sell their goods online to people from all over the world, or because a blogger – even if he offers only his thoughts free of charge – wants to reach as many people possible with his message.
That is why the first, and in my opinion BIGGEST, challenge anyone faces who gets confronted with a legal issue online is – which law is applicable?

I am not giving you the answer here – because I don’t want to spoil the fun. No, honestly, it’s not an easy one to give.
Another, almost equally big problem that one comes across in IT law is the mere fact that legislature is always a couple of years (how many depends on who you ask) behind the technical reality.
There will always be legal challenges in tech, or technical challenges in law, but I know how many people get sued over carelessness, and this is avoidable.
All I can really do is make the best out of both passions of mine and have some fun along the way. I’ll keep you posted!

 August 14, 2009  Posted by on August 14, 2009 Law Tagged with: ,  No Responses »
Aug 072009
 

1) You spell “digg” instead of “dig“
2) You check Twitter BEFORE you check your emails
3) You don’t read newspapers, because: “if it’s not on Twitter, it didn’t happen”
4) There are only 3 people from whom you’d get something signed – one of them is “only” famous in Social Media
5) Your first real blog post is about a Social Media icon
6) Your Twitter avatar sports you with a book about – Twitter
7) You want to Tweet that Twitter is down
8) You have an iPhone App with Push Notifications for Twitter, Skype, Facebook and AIM
9) You update your CV on Xing more often than the actual file
10) You are actually able to come up with 9 ways to know that kinda thing (in less than 15min)….

 August 7, 2009  Posted by on August 7, 2009 Social Media Tagged with: , ,  No Responses »